Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 74.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 5.1 |
| 2014-04-02 | 2015-10-27 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.39 inches | 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 208.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 544 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Battery | 3760mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 552 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is slightly better than Nokia Lumia 930, getting a overall score of 74.8 against 69.2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 comes with Android 5.1 OS, and Nokia Lumia 930 has Windows Phone 8.1 OS. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 body is newer and just a little thinner than the Nokia Lumia 930's, although it is also just a bit heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a bit more vivid screen than Nokia Lumia 930, because it has a quite higher display pixels density, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bigger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia Lumia 930, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Lumia 930 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores and an additional GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Lumia 930, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity.
Lumia 930 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it has a lower (4K) video definition, a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in low-light situations and a lower 20 MP resolution back facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.