Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| 2014-04-02 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.39 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 208.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 552 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has a score of 77.4, which is better than Lumia 930's global score of 69.2. The Moto Z2 Play construction is notably newer, somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than the Lumia 930. Motorola Moto Z2 Play's CPU is just as good as the processing unit in Lumia 930, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Lumia 930 counts with a brighter screen than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080, the Lumia 930 also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch. The Lumia 930 counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rate and a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Lumia 930 also counts with a much better resolution back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia Lumia 930, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto Z2 Play features superior battery life than Lumia 930, because it has a 24 percent greater battery capacity.
The Moto Z2 Play is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.