Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | -- |
| 2014-04-02 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Green, Orange and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 208.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 552 hours standby time 11.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Lumia 930's global score of 69.2. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than the Lumia 930. The Galaxy A50 features just a little better performance than Lumia 930, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM memory.
The Nokia Lumia 930 counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density. Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Lumia 930, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A50 has a bit better camera than Lumia 930, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also counts with faster video frame rates, a much bigger aperture and a camera with more mega pixels. The Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery lifetime than Lumia 930, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.