Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Windows Phone 8 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-02-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.39 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 432 hours standby time 16.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the Lumia Icon, with a global score of 83.7 against 68. LG V50 ThinQ comes with Android 10 OS, and Lumia Icon works with Windows Phone 8 OS. LG V50 ThinQ is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than Lumia Icon, but it is also a little heavier. The Nokia Lumia Icon counts with a bit more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a bit less pixels per inch of screen, a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit faster processing unit than Lumia Icon, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Nokia Lumia Icon, because although it has a back camera with a much lower resolution and a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a much better video definition and a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Nokia Lumia Icon, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better battery duration than Lumia Icon, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2420mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also the cheapest one, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.