Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 68 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Windows Phone 8 | -- |
| 2014-02-12 | 2017-03-31 |
| 5.39 x 2.79 x 0.39 inches | 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2420mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 432 hours standby time 16.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G5 Plus has a score of 74.6, which is a little bit better than Nokia Lumia Icon's general score of 68. The Motorola Moto G5 Plus is a noticeably newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Nokia Lumia Icon. Nokia Lumia Icon has a more vivid display than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1920 x 1080 resolution, the Nokia Lumia Icon also counts with a just a bit higher display pixels density.
Motorola Moto G5 Plus features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia Lumia Icon, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage. The Nokia Lumia Icon counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU.
Moto G5 Plus has a slightly better camera than Lumia Icon, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, and they both have a same size sensor, the Moto G5 Plus also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Moto G5 Plus has better battery lifetime than Lumia Icon, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity.
Moto G5 Plus not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.