Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Symbian 9.3 | -- |
| 2009-02-17 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.07 x 2.02 x 0.65 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 154 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 75 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.48 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 315 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than the Nokia N86 8MP's 43.1 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a a lot newer and way thinner device than the Nokia N86 8MP, although it is just a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a way better looking screen than Nokia N86 8MP, because it has a way larger display, a lot higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia N86 8MP, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with an extremely better CPU than Nokia N86 8MP, because it has 3,93 GB more RAM and more cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a way better battery performance than Nokia N86 8MP, because it has a 150% larger battery size. Galaxy S9 shoots way better photographs and videos than Nokia N86 8MP, because it has a camera with lot more MP and a way better (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more money than Nokia N86 8MP, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.