Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Symbian 9.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2008-02-11 | 2020-08-20 |
| 4.05 x 2.16 x 0.70 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.40 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 355.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 143 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM9 (Single-Core 264 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.4 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| Digital TV Broadcast | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is a lot better than the Nokia N96, getting an 82.9 score against 43.3. Google Pixel 4a is a incredibly newer and way thinner cellphone than Nokia N96, but it's also heavier. The Google Pixel 4a has Android 11 OS, while Nokia N96 works with Symbian 9.3 OS. Google Pixel 4a features a much better performing CPU than Nokia N96, because it has a larger number of cores and 5,88 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 4a has an incredibly better screen than Nokia N96, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution, a lot higher display pixel density and a way larger display. Google Pixel 4a shoots greater videos and photos than Nokia N96, because it has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and video, a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back facing camera with a much better 12.2 megapixels resolution.
Google Pixel 4a features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Nokia N96, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory. The Google Pixel 4a has a superior battery duration than Nokia N96, because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Nokia N96, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.