Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-11-09 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Midnight Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is just a bit better than the Nokia X100, with an 84.7 score against 77.3. Galaxy A32 has Android OS, while Nokia X100 comes with Android 11 OS. Galaxy A32's body has the same thickness than Nokia X100, but it is just a bit lighter. The Nokia X100 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because it has a higher display density, a little bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Nokia X100 features more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB, the Nokia X100 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Nokia X100 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia X100 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better camera than Nokia X100. Both have the same resolution back camera. Galaxy A32 features a bit superior battery performance than Nokia X100, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4470mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.