Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2010-08-17 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.18 x 1.91 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 2.73 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray, Pink and Purple | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 167 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 143,36 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 432 hours standby time 5.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a lot better than the Nokia X3 Touch and Type, with a overall score of 81.6 against 40.4. Google Pixel 2's body is incredibly newer and thinner, but a lot heavier than the Nokia X3 Touch and Type. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a way better display than Nokia X3 Touch and Type, because it has a much higher 1080 x 1920 resolution, a way higher screen density and a way larger display.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a way better performance than Nokia X3 Touch and Type, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and 8 more CPU cores. The Google Pixel 2 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia X3 Touch and Type, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger camera aperture and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Nokia X3 Touch and Type, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a superior battery performance than Nokia X3 Touch and Type, because it has a 2700mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 2 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.