Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 score. Google Pixel 2 is an much older phone than Nokia XR20, but it is way thinner and noticeably lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much bigger display. The Nokia XR20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a much better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Nokia XR20 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4630mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also by far the cheapest, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.