Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Nokia XR20, getting a overall score of 81.3 against 80.8. The Google Pixel XL design is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia XR20, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little sharper display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater count of pixels per screen inch.
Nokia XR20 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia XR20 has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same back camera sensor size, the Nokia XR20 also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger aperture. Nokia XR20 has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 34 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia XR20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel XL, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Nokia XR20, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.