Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 general score. Both devices we are comparing include the same Android 11 operating system. Nokia XR20's design is newer than the Moto G Stylus's, although it is notably heavier and somewhat thicker. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM. Moto G Stylus takes a bit better videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Moto G Stylus also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus's memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as the Nokia XR20 one, both have an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto G Stylus. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, else you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G Stylus, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.