Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a bit better than the Moto Z4, having a overall score of 80.8 against 79.8. Nokia XR20's construction is a lot newer than the Moto Z4's, but it is a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has a newer 11 version while Moto Z4 has Android 10, offering some extra features.
The Nokia XR20 features a little sharper screen than Moto Z4, because although it has a just a little lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Moto Z4's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Nokia XR20 one, both have exactly the same internal storage and a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto Z4 captures clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Nokia XR20 counts with longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a bit more money than Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z4. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z4, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.