Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Nokia XR20 works with Android 11 OS. Galaxy A32 is a somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than the Nokia XR20, although both of them were only released 6 months apart.
Nokia XR20 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 features a better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a better screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a camera that is just as good as the Nokia XR20 one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and a same resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia XR20 counts with slightly more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A32 features just a bit longer battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.