Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Nokia XR20, with a score of 84.9 against 80.8. Although the Galaxy A80 is incredibly older than Nokia XR20, it's construction is extremely lighter and thinner. Nokia XR20 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80. Both of them have a same size display, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A80 has a little better processing power than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A80 also has more RAM.
Nokia XR20 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh. The Nokia XR20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same resolution back facing camera, the Nokia XR20 also counts with higher video frame rate and a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.