Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's score of 77.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Nokia XR20 is a older, a lot thicker and much heavier cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because it has much more screen brightness, a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a larger display and a little bit greater pixels density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior camera than Nokia XR20, because it has a much bigger sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a much better video definition, a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory for apps and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 4630mAh.
Nokia XR20 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.