Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the Nothing Phone (2)'s 75.6 general score. The Google Nexus 6P is an much older phone than Nothing Phone (2), but Google could make it lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Nothing Phone (2) has just a bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little worse pixels density and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2412px, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Nothing Phone (2) counts with a little bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has more RAM. The Google Nexus 6P and Nothing Phone (2) have similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have equal internal memory capacity.
Nothing Phone (2) shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nothing Phone (2) also has a larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments, faster video frame rate, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a much longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.