Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Nothing Phone (2), having an 81.6 score against 75.6. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 2 is notably older than Nothing Phone (2), it's design is a little thinner and incredibly lighter. The Nothing Phone (2) features a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nothing Phone (2) also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Nothing Phone (2) counts with a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2412 pixels resolution and a much bigger display. Google Pixel 2 and Nothing Phone (2) count with extremely similar storage for games and applications, both have equal internal storage.
Nothing Phone (2) has a greater camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with higher video frame rate, a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a much bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Nothing Phone (2) has a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.