Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than Nothing Phone (2), having a overall score of 79.7 against 75.6. Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction is just a bit lighter than Nothing Phone (2), although it is just a little thicker and was released many years before. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has the older 11 version and Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12 version.
The Nothing Phone (2) counts with just a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has 4 GB more RAM. The Nothing Phone (2) features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit lower pixel count per display inch, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2412px resolution and a little bit bigger display.
The Moto G Stylus features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nothing Phone (2), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Nothing Phone (2) counts with improved battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Nothing Phone (2) captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with faster video frame rates, a lot larger camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a higher 50 megapixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.