Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than the Nothing Phone (2), having a 77.8 score against 75.6. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12, so it provides some extra features. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is just a little heavier but incredibly thinner than Nothing Phone (2), and they were released only 9 months apart.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Nothing Phone (2), because it has a bigger display, a way brighter display, a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Nothing Phone (2), because it has 384 GB more internal memory.
The Nothing Phone (2) counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Nothing Phone (2), and although they both have a 50 MP resolution back camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher video definition, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a larger sensor providing a higher image quality.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Nothing Phone (2), because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.