Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-07-04 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a lot better than nubia N1's overall score of 63. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while nubia N1 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a notably newer phone, and it's also a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than nubia N1.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better hardware performance than nubia N1, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than nubia N1, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much better camera than nubia N1, because although it has a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos. LG V50 ThinQ features a superior storage to install games and applications than nubia N1, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
Nubia N1 features better battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.