Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-27 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black and Red | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is better than nubia Red Magic 3, with an 86.6 score against 75.6. IPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS, while nubia Red Magic 3 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. The iPhone SE (2022) is a way newer cellphone, and it is also much thinner and noticeably lighter than nubia Red Magic 3.
The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, although it has a really smaller screen, a quite worse screen pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334px. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2022), because it has more internal storage.
The iPhone SE (2022) features a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 2 less CPU cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a greater camera than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera in the back with a way higher 48 MP resolution and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Apple iPhone SE (2022) is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.