Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Google Nexus 6P's design is lighter and extremely thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it was released 4 years before. Nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better processing power than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Nubia Red Magic 3 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 takes greater pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a bigger camera sensor, a way better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger aperture for better photos in low-light situations and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
The Google Nexus 6P costs a bit more money than nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.