Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. Google Pixel XL is an noticeably older phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, but Google was able to build it a lot lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Google Pixel XL counts with a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has more processing cores and more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with much more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3 takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments, a bigger sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a lot better video definition and a camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
The Google Pixel XL is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.