Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's score of 75.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even when the LG V50 ThinQ and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released only 1 months apart, the LG V50 ThinQ is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better performance than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a much more mega-pixels back camera and a lot bigger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with greater battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.