Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a 76.4 score against 75.6. Even though the Motorola Droid Turbo is extremely older and somewhat thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's construction is still lighter. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. Motorola Droid Turbo features a better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a very superior camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture and a way better resolution back-facing camera. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has improved battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 28% greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Droid Turbo is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.