Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a global score of 77.9 against 75.6. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is lighter than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a higher screen density.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with greater battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% more battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.