Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a global score of 81.2 against 75.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50's body is incredibly newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1220 x 2712 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 3 one, both of them have the same 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50's battery lifetime is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3's battery life. Nubia Red Magic 3 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back camera and a way smaller sensor providing a lot lower image quality, it also counts with a lot better video quality and a bigger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.