Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Red | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a 79.7 score against 75.6. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a slightly better camera than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, a same size sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition. The Moto G Stylus counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Moto G Stylus is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.