Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Red | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. The Motorola Moto Z4 is a thinner and lighter device than the nubia Red Magic 3, although they were released only a couple of months apart. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto Z4 has the older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little better performance than Moto Z4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a quite bigger screen.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, a same size sensor and a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality. Motorola Moto Z4 has just a bit more memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Moto Z4 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.