Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3's general score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is newer, just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and nubia Red Magic 3 works with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a 48 megapixels resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way higher video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy A32 features a battery duration that's just as good as the nubia Red Magic 3 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.