Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A60's body is lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, although both were released only 1 months apart. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A60 has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Galaxy A60 and nubia Red Magic 3 both have really similar displays, because although the Galaxy A60 has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A60, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A60, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a lot more MP camera in the back and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.