Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a global score of 84.2 against 75.6. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s construction is noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a display that's very similar to the display in nubia Red Magic 3, because although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a little bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way better resolution camera, a lot better video resolution and a much larger back-facing camera sensor. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.