Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 global score. The Galaxy A71 5G is a newer device, and it is also lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM. Galaxy A71 5G has a display that is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3 one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little bit greater pixel density and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
Galaxy A71 5G has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes slightly better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor, faster video frame rates and a back camera with much more MP.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.