Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than nubia Red Magic 3, having an 84.9 score against 75.6. Samsung Galaxy A80's body is just a bit heavier but just a little thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, and both were only released 0 months apart. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A80, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A80, although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, they both have a display of the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same resolution back camera and a 0.5 inches sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.