Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat lighter and extremely thinner than nubia Red Magic 3, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a little bigger screen and a bit better screen density. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.