Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having a 79.3 score against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older device than the nubia Red Magic 3, but Samsung could make it incredibly thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel amount in each inch of screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM and more processing cores. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video, a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S6 edge+ is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.