Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Even though vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a little bit heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's a lot thinner and way newer. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a bigger display, a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 256 GB more internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a bit better photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same video resolution, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has better 30 fps video frame rate, a better 50 mega pixels resolution camera and a lot larger sensor shooting way better quality photos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 14 percent greater battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy nubia Red Magic 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.