Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with a 78.8 score against 75.6. Vivo X60 Pro is a newer device, and it is also lighter and much thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X60 Pro has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a little bit better pixel density. The vivo X60 Pro's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3's one, they have equal 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 3. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 12 GB RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a slightly better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has superior battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.