Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a global score of 85.5 against 75.6. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is older than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's design is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.