Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-10-16 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Cyber shade | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x OS, and nubia Red Magic 3S works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s design is notably newer, a lot lighter and extremely thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features just a little better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 8 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone SE (2022) features just a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 pixels resolution, a little lower pixel number per inch of display and a much smaller display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S takes way better photographs and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a back facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone SE (2022), because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better battery duration than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 148% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the iPhone SE (2022) is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.