Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-01-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Phantom Black and Rebel Grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | QualcommSnapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 84.2 against 75.8. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro is a much newer and a little bit thinner device than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it is just a bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro has a much better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite higher display pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better performing processor than Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video definition, the Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro also counts with a higher resolution back facing camera, better video frame rates and a way larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Asus ROG Phone 8 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 5500mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.