Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a global score of 80.3 against 75.8. Google Nexus 6P's construction is lighter and notably thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 45% greater battery size. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a lot better camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot better video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
The Google Nexus 6P costs a little more than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.