Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. The Google Pixel XL is an notably older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's much lighter and thinner anyway. Google Pixel XL features a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a faster processing unit than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 8 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel XL, because it has a back camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures, a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel XL is way more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.