Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Cyber shade | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 77 against 75.8. LG V20 is an way older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's lighter and extremely thinner anyway. LG V20 counts with a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixels density.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite superior hardware performance than LG V20, because it has a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better camera than LG V20, because it has a bigger aperture, a lot larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The LG V20 has a better storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V20 is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.