Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. LG V50 ThinQ is a lighter and thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released with only a few months difference. These phones come with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit more powerful processor than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor, a lot better video quality and a much more mega pixels back camera. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features improved battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.