Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has a global score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. The Motorola Droid Turbo is a notably older and somewhat thicker phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Motorola was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit faster CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and 9 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a lot more mega pixels camera in the back, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery size.
Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.