Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has an overall score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the older 4.4.4 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola DROID Turbo's body is lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is somewhat thicker and was released 5 years before.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a better pixel amount in each screen inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit better processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3S takes much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.