Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's general score of 75.8. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has the older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer phone, and it's also lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with as much storage to install games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 3S, both have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 and nubia Red Magic 3S have incredibly similar battery durations. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a back camera with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.