Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 79.7 score against 75.8. The Moto G Stylus is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter device than the nubia Red Magic 3S, although both of them were only released 6 months apart. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a slightly better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a bit bigger memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better performance than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with improved battery life than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, a 48 mega pixels resolution back camera and a same size camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot better video definition.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.